- iSDaily Wednesday – March 14th, 2018 – Episode 042
On this episode of iSDaily Wednesday with The One True Niz and Paul Gordon, On NewsFire, the Cattle Car Guide Rally of 2018 On Skynetter, Google Helps Killer Drones On Liberty Tech, Printing Cars in China [...]The post iSDaily Wednesday – March 14th, 2018 – Episode 042 appeared first on iState. […]
Did you know that fish were gender benders? Many of you probably knew that many types of fish can change their sex, BUT, a recent study has revealed that when it comes to bending of the genders, er, sex (wait, isn’t gender a social…never mind), it seems the female fishies are much less likely to opt to change to male fish than the male fish are likely to switch teams and go all-girl, so to speak.
The study conducted by the University of Salford in the UK has created just as many questions as it’s answered, like, how come there aren’t more positive gender bending fish role models in films and tv shows? When is Katy Perry going to write the first pro-gender-bender fish song? These are the questions that vex one’s mind when pondering the gender, and actual sex fluidity of fish. They rank right up there with, do fish have feelings, and if they do, do they need safe spaces?
Date: August 22, 2017
Source: University of Salford
Summary: Scientists in the UK have observed a fascinating new fact about sex changing fish: the direction of sex change has implication for population numbers.
More than 400 species of fish are sequential hermaphrodites: that’s to say, they are born one sex and change to the opposite sex later in life to maximise their number of offspring. Species that change from male-to-female are called protandrous and ones changing female-to-male are termed protogynous.
Marine biologists at the University of Salford explored the influence of the direction of sex change and found population numbers to be smaller for fish that change from female into male than the other way around.
Dr Chiara Benvenuto, from the University of Salford, one of the authors of the study published today in Scientific Reports, said: “Until now, studies have mostly looked at differences between species that change sex or not, but we’re interested in the direction of sex change.
“While fecundity and reproductive success are expected to increase with size for both females and males, the fitness advantage can increase more rapidly for one sex than the other: this is when sex change can occur.
“In protandrous species, it is better to be large females, because they produce more eggs, thus small individuals reproduce as males as they grow. In protogynous species, small males cannot compete with large ones, so it is more convenient to be small females first and then turn into large, dominant males later on in life.”
The research team, which specialises in marine genetics and behavioural ecology, measured offspring production based on the number of eggs and sperm produced every year, over a lifetime, based on their growth rate and then used the diversity of genes transferred to the next generation, as a proxy for reproductive success.
Both methods concluded that regardless of the direction of sex change, individuals conform to the same strategy, producing more offspring as the second sex, making sex change a successful strategy. But crucially, they found that population numbers are smaller for protogyous species, making them less resilient.