From our “Longer Leash” files comes this story about an appeals court refusing to reconsider a case in which it struck down the anti-human, anti-liberty conceal carry gun laws of the tyrannical city of Washington DC.
SPONSORIf you like this content, be sure you click here and support iState's ability to deliver to you news for the iStater, the state of one.
A federal appeals court has upheld an earlier decision striking down the “good reason” DC concealed carry permit requirement as unconstitutional.
In the District of Columbia, law-abiding citizens who wish to carry a concealed firearm for protection are required to show a specific cause for needing said weapon, such as documented evidence of death threats or previous attacks. Back in July, a three-person panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled 2-1 that the requirement was unconstitutional in Wrenn v. District of Columbia.
“At the Second Amendment’s core lies the right of responsible citizens to carry firearms for personal self-defense beyond the home, subject to longstanding restrictions,” Judge Thomas Beall Griffith wrote in the 31-page opinion. “These traditional limits include, for instance, licensing requirements, but not bans on carrying in urban areas like D.C. or bans on carrying absent a special need for self-defense. In fact, the Amendment’s core at a minimum shields the typically situated citizen’s ability to carry common arms generally. The District’s good-reason law is necessarily a total ban on exercises of that constitutional right for most D.C. residents. That’s enough to sink this law under Heller.”
The next month, the District filed a petition for the case to be re-heard before the full D.C. appeals court. But it was rejected in a brief order issued on Thursday.