- iSDaily Thursday – February 15th, 2018 – Episode 030
Article Follows after show promotion [...]The post iSDaily Thursday – February 15th, 2018 – Episode 030 appeared first on iState. […]
from https://www.libertarianinstitute.org/libertarianism/dissident-fourth-july/ The freedom Jefferson called for was not universal, it was politically motivated and specific. Jefferson did not intend for someone like Frederick Douglass, a slave turned abolitionist leader, to be blessed with the same liberties as Jefferson declared for himself and his fellow Virginians in the preceding decades. Douglass, speaking before the Ladies’ […]
The so-called Empire of Liberty that Jefferson assisted in establishing in America more than two centuries ago has grown to become the gravest threat to its citizens and the people it often subjugates around the world, even though he argued that:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
The freedom Jefferson called for was not universal, it was politically motivated and specific. Jefferson did not intend for someone like Frederick Douglass, a slave turned abolitionist leader, to be blessed with the same liberties as Jefferson declared for himself and his fellow Virginians in the preceding decades.
Douglass, speaking before the Ladies’ Anti-Slavery Society in Rochester, New York in 1852, gave voice to this contradiction. His speech underlined the “paradox of the positive,” explaining how the rhetoric of liberty had negative connotations for much of the population, specifically and most obviously, those who remained enslaved:
“Would you have me argue that man is entitled to liberty? That he is the rightful owner of his own body? You have already declared it. Must I argue the wrongfulness of slavery? Is that a question for Republicans? Is it to be settled by the rules of logic and argumentation, as a matter beset with great difficulty, involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice, hard to be understood? How should I look to-day, in the presence of Amercans, dividing, and subdividing a discourse, to show that men have a natural right to freedom? speaking of it relatively and positively, negatively and affirmatively. To do so, would be to make myself ridiculous, and to offer an insult to your understanding. There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that does not know that slavery is wrong for him.”
We are not obligated to carry around the baggage of the Founding Fathers, nor honor them out of a sense of tradition or heritage or blind nationalism. My lineage is separate and distinct from Jefferson and his contemporaries, and I know now that many of my friends and family would have been part of the disfavored minority of the time, just as we are today, although under different circumstances.
This Independence Day, instead of offering effusive praise for Jefferson and the Founding Fathers for laying the foundation of the modern American Empire, I would like to honor those individuals who keep the Spirit of ’76 alive, many of whom I call friends. These dissidents who undermine and resist the State daily truly seek independence and liberty in 2017 and beyond.